Academic posters are a valuable way to communicate research clearly and compellingly. CXC researcher Alex Houston describes creating a prize-winning conference poster, drawing on findings from our blue carbon project.

I was excited to present a poster at November’s Blue Carbon: Beyond the Inventory conference – and even happier when it won the ‘best poster’ competition. The event – my first in-person conference, having only started my PhD two months ago – was organised by the Scottish Blue Carbon Forum, Marine Scotland and the University of St. Andrews and hosted by the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

Designed to be accessible to non-experts, the poster was developed as a summary of the literature review which I carried out for an ongoing CXC project – ‘Blue carbon potential of Scottish intertidal wetlands and the implications of sea-level rise: policy brief’. The project’s first output, it reviews the evidence for implementing ‘managed realignment’ in Scotland to create more blue carbon stores.

Managed realignment is the process of either removing all or part of a sea wall to allow tidal flows to enter a previously restricted area. This can allow intertidal habitats such as saltmarshes to be (re)created. Saltmarshes are valuable habitats which form in sheltered coastal environments, supporting unique biodiversity, and reducing coastal flood risk. They can sequester carbon at rates much faster than terrestrial forests, and for much longer periods.

It was a challenge to sift through the research material and decide what to include – to get over the key points without overcrowding the poster. I also had to use accessible language and to describe sometimes complex processes with non-technical terms. The judges liked how it looked visually, said it had a good flow and that it was clear for non-experts such as policy makers – great to hear.

As for presenting the poster, it was a challenge to get into the mindset that I was the expert on the subject area (as I had spent time working on it) when speaking to more experienced researchers and professionals about it. I was quite nervous initially as it was my first time presenting a poster in person – it feels much more exposed than presenting online.

Emissions reductions

The conference was a fantastic learning experience, also giving me the opportunity to hear about many aspects of marine and coastal science, from a range of perspectives, and to identify the next steps for blue carbon research. I particularly enjoyed the keynote presentation given by Prof. Patrick Megonigal, ‘Blue Methane: Challenges and Opportunities Posed by Methane Emissions for Blue Carbon Accounting’. It highlighted how the emissions aspect of blue carbon research is often neglected despite the importance of avoiding over-accounting of emissions reductions.

While our CXC research comes at a time of increasing interest, from both public and private bodies, in using carbon credits from saltmarshes to offset emissions, it is important to acknowledge that increasing blue carbon stores cannot replace significant and rapid emissions reductions. Rather, they can offset any remaining emissions from sectors such as agriculture.

Contributing to the CXC project and attending the conference have provided an excellent start to my PhD journey. I am looking forward to seeing where it takes me!